You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get
people to stop reading them.
Ray Bradbury
I've been learning a lot about banned books this week, and found a number
of reasons why books are banned. In my opinion, the reason why most books
banned is because of vulgar language. It doesn't matter if the books are really
amazing that it deserves the highest medal award. If there are a ton of swear
words than certain people freak out and demand it to be banned. Another reason,
I found why books are banned is because of the topic it talks about, such as
homosexuality, magic, racism, kids killing kids, teen pregnancy, kids
trying to learn how to be accepted but doesn't attend school that much,
etc.
And it makes me angry that all of these books are banned. No,
homosexuality isn't a disease and people won't become gay if they read Heather
Has Two Mommies or any other book that talk about homosexuality. Kids
won't have low morals if they read The Catcher in the Rye, The Adventures
of Huckleberry Finn, or anything else. And no kids won't become violent if they read The
Hunger Games trilogy.
It also makes me angry when some people ban books even though they haven’t
read it at all. What’s the point of banning something if you don’t even know
what the book is really about? Have they even tried to find what the theme
(moral lesson) of the book really is? Have they thought really hard what it
meant to other people or did they just ask themselves, this sucks because it
has etc, let’ s not read it anymore and let’s have
other people not read it or else they’re not a good person or whatever.
That is by law, a violation of free speech. If something is banned at the
library, than that’s taking one less idea that is replaced by yay we banned
this book now let’s burn them or something like that. That’s one less story for
a person to get into, to escape his/her own life at the moment. It’s one less
dream, one more sadness for the author, but it’s a lot more anger for the
people who enjoyed that story.
We have the right to read whatever we want, and it’s our choice to endure
the consequences that come out of it. If someone doesn’t like it than that’s
fine, but it’s stupid of him/her to take that book away from a reader that
enjoyed that book, or a reader that wants to read that book.
It’s like a person who hates the stars and tells the other people to not
go to the stars, if that makes sense.
So I dare you this week and any other week to read a banned book. Whether
it’s a book that has been banned from this year or any other year, read it. And
if you don’t like it then that is fine, but don’t let it get taken away from
the library because that is one less great literature out of the world. A work
of literature that can possibly help us in the future if things go wrong.
Literature that can make people small with one small character, a funny
sentence/paragraph, or something else. Literature that can inspire.
Lists:
Books banned by government (includes governments outside of the United States)
And more if you google: banned books list, or something of that sort.
Yes, random person here. I agree with you- books shouldn't be banned due to the content. A morally loose book most likely won't make someone lascvicious. I think I spelled that wrong, but oh well. I've read a banned book before, but I forgot what it was... I really liked it though- more in depth than a lot of things I read. ^_^
ReplyDeleteHonestly, if you've read Harry Potter, you've read a banned book. I've read a ton of banned books - and didn't even know it until banned book week when I went to the library and they had a display of a bunch of banned books where I was like...hey, I read that..and that...and that one too.
ReplyDeleteBut yeah, I don't agree with banned books. Any limitation on what you can read is bad, regardless of the reason. Like when I was in kindergarten (and this isn't specifically banned books) we were only allowed to pick books from the school library off one shelf, which had only really basic reading books. I was already a good reader, wanted to check out a chapter book, and found the basic books so boring. Restricting what a person can read is wrong.
@ Alice.
ReplyDeleteI believe that a lot of people read a banned book without knowing that it is banned. And they turned out fine, unlike what some people say.
And can you try to describe the book that you've mentioned about? I'm looking for some more books that can make me think and isn't assigned to me from my teachers or my older sister.
I read John Green's "Looking for Alaska" and as far as I can tell, it's been banned simply because of a bit of pot and a smidgen of nudity. Any high school student hears about these things from their peers, and I figure it's better to read about them from an intelligent author's perspective than have those subjects just passed down from grade to grade with no real knowledge.
ReplyDelete*Sigh.*